Projects

King, M., Hernandez-Castillo, C. R., Poldrack, R. A., Ivry, R. B., & Diedrichsen, J. (2019). Functional boundaries in the human cerebellum revealed by a multi-domain task battery. Nature neuroscience, 22(8), 1371-1378.

My contribution: This project was a mammoth undertaking of great personal importance. I designed, piloted, and collected fMRI, eyetracking, and behavioral data for 26 unique tasks across four neuroimaging sessions for 30 healthy adults, totaling 300 hours of experimental time (not including participant recruitment), and 5 terabytes of data. I recruited two research assistants to help me with data collection. I designed and executed the analysis pipelines and statistical tests, and in collaboration with my advisors, I wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Our co-authors provided feedback and edits. I conducted the follow-up analyses requested by reviewers.

Mapping the human cerebellum

Collaborators: Joern Diedrichsen; Carlos Hernandez (Western University) and Richard Ivry (UC Berkeley)

In the media: Berkeley Press Release; Psychology Today; Knowable Magazine


The aim of this project was to build a novel atlas of the human cerebellum by characterizing how subregions of this “little brain” represent diverse processes from language and attention to social cognition. Leveraging large amounts of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and machine learning techniques, we built a comprehensive, first-of-its-kind, functional atlas of the cerebellum. Three important findings emerged from this work: First, our atlas provided a superior account of the underlying data, relative to other existing atlases of the cerebellum. Second, anatomical boundaries were of minimal utility in accounting for the functional patterns observed in the cerebellum. This raises an important caveat given that anatomically defined regions have served as the basis for just about all fMRI or lesion reconstruction studies of the cerebellum. Third, we were able to provide cognitive labels for each cerebellar region. To this end, we made use of an on-line ontology of cognitive terms associated with different tasks. Since publication, the functional atlas, along with the labels, has been widely adopted by the neuroscience community to analyze novel patterns of cerebellar activity, and to use as a guide for testing new hypotheses of cerebellar function.  

King, M., Shahshahani, L., Ivry, R. B., & Diedrichsen, J. (2023). A task-general connectivity model reveals variation in convergence of cortical inputs to functional regions of the cerebellum. Elife, 12, e81511.

My Contribution: I leveraged two large-scale fMRI datasets I had previously designed for two other projects (the first dataset is described as part of Article 3). For the second dataset, I designed 5 unique tasks, and recruited a team of four research assistants to assist with data collection, which totaled 250 hours (not including participant recruitment). I mentored a junior graduate student on building computational models and she leveraged the analysis pipelines I had written to produce new models. 

mODELING CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CORTEX AND CEREBELLUM

Collaborators: Joern Diedrichsen; Ladan Shahshahani (Western University) and Richard Ivry (UC Berkeley)

Most neuroimaging studies investigating the cerebellum’s role in cognition do not consider the relative cortical contributions to cerebellar function. In order to meaningfully interpret cerebellar activation, it is critical to examine, in parallel, the relationship between the cortex and the cerebellum. I leveraged a large task battery to establish a quantitative model of connectivity to better understand domain-general functions of the cerebellum. To uncover robust and reliable patterns of cortico-cerebellar connectivity, I trained models on cortical activity patterns and tested them on held-out cerebellar data. I varied the degree of convergence between the cerebral cortex and cerebellum in order to adjudicate between different possible architectures. I made two important contributions with this work: 1) I demonstrated that cerebellar activation is not simply a reflection of a one-to-one mapping between the cortex and the cerebellum, instead it is the result of convergence of inputs from disparate cortical regions onto the same cerebellar region, and 2) I found that the degree of convergence between the cortex and the cerebellum differed across cerebellar regions with highest convergence observed in areas linked to cognition, working memory, and language. 

King, M., Bruinsma, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2022). No evidence for semantic prediction deficits in individuals with cerebellar degeneration. Neurobiology of Language, 1-17.

My Contribution: As a core chapter of my thesis, I contributed to every aspect of the project from experimental design through to publication of the paper. Notably, this project was one of my most successful experiences of mentorship. While I originally designed and piloted the experiment, I then closely mentored an undergraduate student who moved the experiment online, recruited patients, and oversaw patients’ completion of the study. I wrote the original data analysis pipeline and I mentored the student in running the statistical tests. Myself and my co-authors wrote and edited the paper, and as corresponding author, I oversaw the review process.

Cerebellar degeneration and language impairment

Collaborators: Sienna Bruinsma and Richard Ivry (UC Berkeley)

Over the past three decades, a large number of theories have been proposed in an attempt to explain cerebellar contributions to cognition. Despite significant empirical efforts, it is still unclear what unique functions are contributed by the cerebellum to cognition. Therefore, I took a clinical approach, using neuropsychology, to address the functional role of the cerebellum in a well-studied domain: language processing. I designed an online study to test whether individuals with cerebellar degeneration showed reduced sensitivity to semantic prediction. Previous neuroimaging work has shown that cerebellar activation increases in contexts in which semantic predictions are generated and violated, however, the results from neuropsychological studies have been inconclusive. Given these mixed results, I wanted to design a tightly controlled behavioral experiment that would offer a more robust account of cerebellar deficits in language processing. The results failed to find any difference between patients with cerebellar degeneration and healthy controls. These results challenge current theorizing about the role of the cerebellum in language processing, pointing to a misalignment between neuroimaging and neuropsychology.

centering the developing cerebellum in cognition 

The cerebellum has been the focus of significant debate over the past five decades, and it has been implicated in a wide range of cognitive functions extending beyond sensorimotor control. Much of the empirical research on the function of the cerebellum has been centered on the ‘little brain’ in its mature, adult form. However, we are now starting to appreciate that the developing cerebellum offers a unique window into understanding how and what this structure contributes to cognition. In this review, I document the vulnerability of the developing cerebellum, and present recent work on the co- occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. autism spectrum disorder) and atypical cerebellar development. Building on these observations, I discuss the differences in cerebellar architecture through the lens of injury, and consider how cerebellar function is interpreted from infancy to adulthood.  

King, M. & Ivry, R.B (in prep). Cerebellum selectively engages action and social prediction during early learning.

HOW DOES THE CEREBELLUM LEARN? 

Collaborators: Richard Ivry (UC Berkeley)

Transcriptomics and the cerebellum

Collaborators: Leana King, Richard Ivry, Kevin Weiner (UC Berkeley)


LEVERAGING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS TO PREDICT SUICIDE ATTEMPT

Collaborators: Satra Ghosh, PhD (MIT); Ran Barzilay, MD, PhD (Penn); Aaron Alexander-Bloch, MD, PhD (Penn)

SEMANTIC SIMILARITY OF CLINICAL QUESTIONNAIRES

Collaborators: Satra Ghosh, PhD (MIT); Arno Klein (Child Mind Institute); Kai McClennan (MIT); Kseniia Konishchev (CRI Paris)

SEX DIFFERENCES IN ADHD DIAGNOSIS

Collaborators: Satra Ghosh, PhD (MIT); Allyson Brown (Wellesley)